EVE Search - Hurley dead

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Hurley dead

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.21 03:17:00 - [1] Originally by: Nick Curso Originally by: Goose Hypocrisy Let's just mention Hegemon Rast and how you guys griefed him out of game with vile accusations which turned out to be false then In before someone mentions T20 love it when the old stuff comes up :) I can only apologise most sincerely, and assure you that our pets, Goonswarm will be spoken to severely. It goes without saying, that allowing this thread to run 3 pages without a T20 reference is unacceptable, and falls far short of the standards one could reasonably expect. IT won't happen again.
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.21 14:20:00 - [2] Would anyone else be amused, if it transpired that "Hurley" logged on through a proxy, before announcing he his move to IT?
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.24 14:24:00 - [3] Originally by: Le Cardinal Originally by: Comy 1 Originally by: Le Cardinal Originally by: Hurley truth being backstabbed by your leaders is bad, especially losing a titan because of it. Only good outcome is that they showed their true colors. This gives the rest of the memberbase a chance to bail with their assets before it happens to them too. And fighting a war for a corp like this isnt worth it at all. After reading Hurleys post I find this funny comming from an IT guy. I guess the same thing could be said about you. But smack aside. Regardless of whom im aligned to its pretty sad to see how a corp can treat its members. Its nothing the cheer about, since its quite sad for the person inflicted. I dont condone such acts by anyone. Good enough for you? Did you not read either Hurley's or Comy's post?? Comy was pointing out to you, mister used-2-b-bob, how very badly treated Hurley was in BNC, and thus anyone from IT commits crass hypocrisy if they criticise SoT/PL for the same thing. Stick to laughing at them for incredible stupidity, its much safer ground, and far from that house of glass you call your alliance. OK, not that far; suggestion use small stones and don't throw too hard.
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.24 14:55:00 - [4] Edited by: Fat Ducker on 24/11/2009 14:56:16 Originally by: Torothin Please stop posting Hurley, you're making us look like idiots. Originally by: DeathCamper Please stop posting Hurley, you're making us look like idiots. Don't blame him, much as he might enjoy the credit, you guys are doing all the work.
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.24 16:14:00 - [5] Originally by: Torothin Edited by: Torothin on 24/11/2009 16:02:44 I have acted unfavorably. Best of luck with your new house and great dane. Was: Quote: he dropped his own roles. Don't let him lie to you. Back pedalling so soon? PS <3 eve search!
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.24 16:28:00 - [6] Originally by: the blender I dont and never have belived you were nunu, I did however belive that nunu was your friend and when we wanted too contact you he was the man too see. I am not DVRN never have and never will be, I dont make policy in DVRN and as such have no say in who they hire or fire. Like I said "IF" in the fullness of time Grappler is proved wrong then I will apologise but that has yet too happen, lots of statements have been made about the internal workings of DVRN, but no proof has been offered, I would welcome a screenshot of the roles audit interface but so far it hasnt been forthcomming. So bring some proof too the table, back your statements up, and I will apologise, but at the moment nothing has changed and even in the event I apologise too you, it still dosnt mean your getting back in, because that simply isnt my call too make in the first place. Denial aint just a river in Egypt, as someone much wiser than anyone in this thread, once said.
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.24 17:06:00 - [7] Originally by: Metal Dude Originally by: the blender I am interested too know how much real life money you expected too get for your titan given current prices and the fact that they arnt selling well at all, if indeed you as you stated intended too ebay it. So the story keeps changing. First he was leaving for IT, then it was that he was inactive, now itÆs he was ebaying the titan off? So not only you kill his titan without any proof of his wrongdoing, you are asking him for proof of his innocence while accusing him of exploit that can get him banned from EVE? How about you provide some proof that he was doing any of the things you say? Remember when he was kicked out BoB cos he lost a titan, which is completely unacceptable (unless you're swedish and eligible for SAGA membership)? No? How convenient ...
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.24 17:56:00 - [8] Originally by: Tertiacero I'm not a big fan of any of the major powerbases in this game atm, but regardless of whether it was a troll or a case of someone actually leaving this just seems like an overly childish reaction to the situation. One that certainly won't help your recruiting any. Are you suggesting that SoT will suffer because their leadership has demonstrated a capacity for making moronic snap judgements, based little or no information? What I'd love to know is: Who was the 1st person to suggest Hurley was going to defect? You tell me that, and I'll tell you who your IT spy is ....
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.24 18:17:00 - [9] Originally by: Sergeant Shafto Guys guys guys, you are missing the point... Originally by: Hurley 2 weeks ago I decide that I do want to sell Hurley and the titan and just be a normal, everyday pilot. He didn't want it anyway! So it's everybody else missing the point? You're thinking, based on what in alliance chat, that this isn't going your alliance. The only reason you have the luxury of that delusion is because those aghast at the unsurpassed stupidity of SoT's leadership aren't saying anything, cos they know full well that they will get the "SPAI!" label next. Still, this thread will make for some fantastic quotes when the cascade gets started properly. Pet cascades = best cascades (mainly cos of the horror they display when the master doesn't come to save them).
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.24 22:40:00 - [10] Originally by: Hurley I love how so many SoT guys not only not care what happened, but decide to publicly display my desire to disobey the EULA in an attempt to get me banned. Thanks for kicking a guy when he's down, I appreciate it. 2 things: 1) Nothing you have publicly stated amounts to a EULA violation, and anything stated by anyone else doesn't constitute proof, unless you confirm it. 2) Do you think anyone in SoT who holds any sympathy for you is going to make that known? Doing so would very probably result in a very poor outcome for them.
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.25 09:26:00 - [11] Originally by: Yazoul Samaiel Funny thing is all the pubbie clowns are coming here to play the sympathy and omg no e-honor card , the irony is overwhelming . As a pubbie clown I take umbrage at the suggestion I have: 1) Been sympathetic 2) Made any e-honour references (see, I even spell it wrong) I see my job, in compliance with our strict equal opportunity trolling policy, to point out the massive inconsistencies in other posters output, and to laugh at SoT's incredible ignorance and stupidity. Honestly finding out that they killed one of their own titans, in part because the guy was ex-BoB (something you would have expected them to notice during recruitment, not months later), is one of the funniest things I've ever seen on COAD. Though I would draw your attention to the e-honor[sic] thing. When an alliance is subjected to duress, the difference between cohesion and cascade is usually the memberships belief & confidence in its leadership. I'll let you decide how this will work out for your southern fountain meatshield / pet.
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.26 12:44:00 - [12] Originally by: General Windypops The biggest mystery to me is why SoT leadership can't actually just apologise. I don't get what they're so scared of. If they'd just admitted that they'd made a mistake this would have blown over within a day. Listen mister, this is the 1st blue-on-blue titan kill in eve history (AFAIK). If some people would make just a tiny bit more effort, this could easily make page 15.
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.26 16:44:00 - [13] Originally by: Kim Chubby I heard from a very reputable and respected member of SOT If ever a phrase screamed "TROLL!", it's this one.
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.27 14:55:00 - [14] Edited by: Fat Ducker on 27/11/2009 15:07:14 Originally by: General Windypops How can PL 'demand' that you kick someone? Aren't they a different alliance? Windy, it's like when mommy tells you it's time for bed, there's no arguing; she's much bigger than you and if you don't do what you're told, your internet spaceship privileges are taken away. I'd like to take a moment to thank everyone who stepped up, when on page 13 this thread appeared to be heading for the oblivion of second page of COAD. Special mention goes to Metal Dude, usually the bitterest poster on COAD, for bringing us the superb comedy that those logs delivered, which in turn prompted Sabre Wulf to deliver that awesome "we're not tarded really" hurf (oh yes you are). I always had faith that this thread could deliver so much more, and it has, here's to another glorious 16 pages! (it's not like anything else will happen before tuesdays anyways). Glorious page 16 snypa!
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.27 20:22:00 - [15] Edited by: Fat Ducker on 27/11/2009 20:23:44 Originally by: Shirley C P.S: My words are of my own opinion and do not reflect those of my corporation or alliance. I will leave it to them to comment on their own behalf. Translates as: Viper didn't make me write this, nor were any threats involved in the creation of this post. I have no idea where you went to damage control school, but it's clear you have a solid case for demanding a refund of any fees paid. Before your insightful and novel approach (e.g. editing killmails) it was difficult to see how SoT had any room to make themselves look bigger idiots than had already been achieved. Then you came along and added your own, very personal, touch to the debacle. Well done sir! Edit: An even more glorious page 17 snypa!!
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.28 14:49:00 - [16] Originally by: Hoshino As far as i see it there is only 1 option open for SOT to do some dmg control, give Hurley a new titan or the isk he lost. There is no excuse open for you guys not after your chats were posted, it shows how you were utterly suckered into killing 1 of your own. If you do nothing i just have to say good luck recruting cap pilots in the future cause right now you are your own worst enemy. No, no, no. A couple more posts from Grappler, Sabre Wulf et al and the whole matter will evaporate like the morning mist.
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.29 14:40:00 - [17] Originally by: General Windypops I have made a forum signature graphic (high res) that you are welcome to use. Join the campaign! DO THE RIGHT THING SONS OF TANGRA. DO THE RIGHT THING. My god, I knew this thread had potential but I never saw this. Windy returning to the kind of form we haven't seen since his "Bee gone" campaign of '06. It's good to have you back sir! o7
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.11.29 22:30:00 - [18] Originally by: WShatner Originally by: TanHuynh No comment on the chat log, each Alliance has its own "style" command channel. But damn, I want to be PL so badly, uber-power toward pet. I'm sick to death of all this talk about PL 'abusing' SoT. Rather than calling it condescension it should be viewed as education. PL have earned their reputation as the PVP powerhouse of Eve through hard work, brutal sweat and tears. You don't get that kind of legendary status by mincing around wearing tutus and obsessing about each others feelings. It's a tough world. And they're the toughest of the tough. Fanboi alts = best alts.
Fat Ducker Amarr Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.12.12 16:15:00 - [19] Edited by: Fat Ducker on 12/12/2009 16:24:01 Originally by: Tsouras So whats happened is SOT killed Hurley's personally owned Titan, which either SOT or Hurley can replace in short notice and thus is no real loss for SOT except SOT lost alot of good repute. But that won't stop us, we got a few more Titans yet Just when (well a fortnight after) you thought it was safe for SoT to pop up on CAOD, cos even the naughty trolls (like me) had finished picking over this particularly tasty carcass. Then the 14th stupidest gimp in SoT (promotion beckons I'm sure) digs it up again. To tell us it wasn't really a loss at all. Let me remind you, Hurley was killed because your complete & total moron leadership thought he was to join an alliance that he hates as much as IT hates him. Seriously, I bet he still has more contempt for Coranor than Grappler. OK lets all scan those logs metal dude pasted up, let's review Grappler's brilliant grasp of logic, lets ...... oh bloody well read it yourself.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.